Shadow Chase
By:Stephanie P. Logue
Published on 2002-03-01 by iUniverse
When Paula Wunderlich receives a letter from absent husband Bruce asking for a divorce, she and daughter Hope travel to Wunderland Dude Ranch in the Texas hill country in an effort to restore the family. However, something is terribly wrong at Wunderland. Bruce alternates between resenting Paula and making feeble efforts at reconciliation. Handsome wrangler Ike Ryan is hostile. Beautiful Annelise Sequeira's tentative offer of friendship is withdrawn when her neglected son, Tully, adores Paula. Wrangler Dean Skymore finds Paula amusing. Attorney Al Hines' arrival further complicates the picture. Paula's sole quest in leaving home for Wunderland was to win back her husband. Instead, she becomes embroiled in the mystery of a young girl's disappearance, distressed by Tully's neglect and involved in a community effort to start a Christian school. Before it is over, Paula is thrown from a deliberately spooked horse and trapped in a burning building. These physical pains cannot match the pain of her broken heart when she learns of Bruce's betrayal. And when Bruce tries to rescue her from the fire and is critically injured, she must decide whether to forgive Bruce and restore her marriage or leave him and learn to love again with Ike.
This Book was ranked at 32 by Google Books for keyword Suspense.
Book ID of Shadow Chase's Books is UkKuGNEzESoC, Book which was written byStephanie P. Loguehave ETAG "nn9FnpTu40w"
Book which was published by iUniverse since 2002-03-01 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781469718323 and ISBN 10 Code is 1469718324
Reading Mode in Text Status is false and Reading Mode in Image Status is false
Book which have "212 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryFiction
This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""
This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE
Book was written in en
eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is trueand in ePub is false
Book Preview
Don't you kind of hate how we've joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the reviews compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now nude and unabashed inside their variously effective attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were evenly plainspoke Do not you type of hate how we have entered the decadent stage of Goodreads where possibly fifty % (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually bare and unabashed within their variously effective efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were uniformly plainspoken, merely effective, unpretentious, and -- most importantly else -- boring, boring, boring? Don't you type of hate when people say'don't you think in this manner or feel this way'in an effort to goad you both psychologically and grammatically into agreeing together? In the words of ABBA: I actually do, I really do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Well, because the interwebs is a world by which the past stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we could revisit days gone by in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at least until this amazing site finally tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I have bound it with huge string and drawn it here for your perusal. (Please understand that several a sic are recommended in the following reviews.) its actually difficult and silly! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that guide is excellent! There you have it. Refreshingly, not a evaluation written in one of the witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal yell unleashed in to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and a quality that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies that he designs problems... that will be the case, for all I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you never want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it was meant to be read, then it would be a novel, not really a play. Along with that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every single character for a couple pages). None folks had see the play before. None folks wanted to learn it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to learn plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you definitely have sinned and are likely to hell, if you believe in hell. Or even, you're going to the DMV. I am also fed up with all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age once we are taught to respect each other's differences, it seems offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow on your petty linguistic rules. Inventive phrase will probably free of charge themselves however you might try in order to shackle it. That's your current cue, Aubrey. Within our opinion, the actual engage in Macbeth was this worste peice actually authored by Shakespeare, and also this says quite a lot thinking about furthermore read through her Romeo and Juliet. Ontop regarding it really is by now astounding storyline, naive figures as well as absolutly discusting set of ethics, Shakespeare freely molds Female Macbeth since the true vilian while in the play. Taking into consideration she actually is mearly a tone of voice with your back spherical and also Macbeth herself will be truely doing this hideous offenses, which include tough and also deception, I do not see why it is so easy to believe in which Macbeth would probably be ready to undertake beneficial instead of bad only if their wife ended up additional possitive. I think until this participate in will be uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless the next is in no way this ne plus especially connected with basic guide reviewing. Though succinct and also with virtually no unproductive inclination so that you can coyness as well as cuteness, Jo's review alludes to the animosity consequently deep that it's inexpressible. A single imagines some Signet Timeless Models hacked in order to parts with pruning shears around Jo's vicinity. I personally don't like this kind of play. A case in point this I am unable to perhaps supply you with almost any analogies or perhaps similes in respect of the amount of I actually detest it. A incrementally snarkier style might have reported a little something like...'I don't really like that engage in as being a simile I can not surface with.' Certainly not Jo. The lady talks some sort of fresh, undecorated reality unhealthy pertaining to figurative language. And there is no problem having that. Once throughout an excellent whilst, when you are getting neck-deep around dandified pomo hijinks, it really is a nice wallow within the hog pencil you happen to be itchin'for. Thank you, Jo. I like your in vain learning at similes that are not able to tactic the actual bilious hatred with your heart. You're quarry, as well as I'm yours. Figuratively communicating, with course. And today this is my own evaluate: Macbeth through William Shakespeare is a good fictional operate inside Language expressions, in addition to anyone that disagrees is surely an asshole along with a dumbhead.
Comments
Post a Comment